Zoonotic Disease Surveillance and Control: Safeguarding Both Animal and Human Populations

  • Sujata V. Patil, Abhay Ghatage, Ashvini V. Jadhav
Keywords: Zoonotic diseases, Surveillance, Control measures, Public health, One Health

Abstract

Zoonotic diseases pose significant threats to both animal and human populations, necessitating robust surveillance and control measures to safeguard public health and ensure animal welfare. This abstract provides an overview of the importance of zoonotic disease surveillance and control, highlighting key strategies and challenges in this critical endeavor. Zoonotic diseases, which originate in animals but can be transmitted to humans, constitute a substantial portion of emerging infectious diseases. Examples include avian influenza, rabies, Ebola virus disease, and COVID-19. These diseases not only jeopardize human health but also impact animal populations, agricultural productivity, and economic stability. Effective surveillance is foundational to understanding the epidemiology of zoonotic diseases. This involves monitoring animal populations for signs of illness, tracking disease outbreaks, and conducting research to identify potential sources and transmission pathways. Additionally, close collaboration between public health agencies, veterinary services, and environmental organizations is essential for early detection and rapid response to emerging threats. Control measures encompass a range of interventions aimed at reducing disease transmission between animals and humans. Vaccination programs, vector control, hygiene practices, and public education campaigns are among the strategies employed to mitigate zoonotic risks.

References

[1] Tan, A.; Salman, M.; Wagner, B.; McCluskey, B. The Role of Animal Health Components in a Biosurveillance System: Concept and Demonstration. Agriculture 2023, 13, 457.
[2] Enticott, G.; Earl, L.; Gates, M.C. A systematic review of social research data collection methods used to investigate voluntary animal disease reporting behaviour. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022, 69, 2573–2587.
[3] Gates, M.C.; Earl, L.; Enticott, G. Factors influencing the performance of voluntary farmer disease reporting in passive surveillance systems: A scoping review. Prev. Vet. Med. 2021, 196, 11.
[4] Fountain, J.; Manyweathers, J.; Brookes, V.J.; Hernandez-Jover, M. Understanding biosecurity behaviors of Australian beef cattle farmers using the ten basic human values framework. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1072929.
[5] Weston, D.; Ip, A.; Amlôt, R. Examining the application of behaviour change theories in the context of infectious disease outbreaks and emergency response: A review of reviews. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1483.
[6] Surendran, A.; McSharry, J.; Meade, O.; Bligh, F.; McNamara, J.; Meredith, D.; O’Hora, D. Increasing Machine-Related Safety on Farms: Development of an Intervention Using the Behaviour Change Wheel Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5394.
[7] Kolodko, J.; Schmidtke, K.A.; Read, D.; Vlaev, I. LetsUnlitterUK: A demonstration and evaluation of the Behavior Change Wheel methodology. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0259747.
[8] Regan, Á.; Burrell, A.; McKernan, C.; Martin, H.; Benson, T.; McAloon, C.; Manzanilla, E.G.; Dean, M. Behaviour change interventions for responsible antimicrobial use on farms. Irish Vet. J. 2023, 76, 8.
[9] Glanville, C.; Abraham, C.; Coleman, G. Human Behaviour Change Interventions in Animal Care and Interactive Settings: A Review and Framework for Design and Evaluation. Animals 2020, 10, 2333.
[10] Biesheuvel, M.M.; Santman-Berends, I.; Barkema, H.W.; Ritter, C.; Berezowski, J.; Guelbenzu, M.; Kaler, J. Understanding Farmers’ Behavior and Their Decision-Making Process in the Context of Cattle Diseases: A Review of Theories and Approaches. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 14.
[11] Sasidharan, S.; Saudagar, P. Leishmaniasis: Where are we and where are we heading? Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 1541–1554.
[12] Smith, N.C.; Goulart, C.; Hayward, J.A.; Kupz, A.; Miller, C.M.; van Dooren, G.G. Control of human toxoplasmosis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2021, 51, 95–121.
[13] Chan, Y.-W.; Hoban, A.; Moore, H.; Greig, D.R.; Painset, A.; Jorgensen, F.; Chattaway, M.A.; Jenkins, C.; Balasegaram, S.; McCormick, J.; et al. Two Outbreaks of Foodborne Gastrointestinal Infection Linked to Consumption of Imported Melons, United Kingdom, March to August 2021. J. Food Prot. 2023, 86, 100027.
[14] Asiyabi Aghdam, S.; Hajipour, N.; Moosavy, M.H. Use of PCR to determine Toxoplasma gondii in milk samples from camels (Camelus dromedarius), cattle (Bos taurus) and buffalos (Bubalus bubalis) in East Azarbaijan province, Iran. Vet. Med. Sci. 2023, 9, 400–404.
[15] Rupasinghe, R.; Chomel, B.B.; Martínez-López, B. Climate change and zoonoses: A review of the current status, knowledge gaps, and future trends. Acta Trop. 2022, 226, 106225.
[16] WHO. New Report Highlights the Impact of Changes in Environment on One Health; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
[17] Farooq, Z.; Sjödin, H.; Semenza, J.C.; Tozan, Y.; Sewe, M.O.; Wallin, J.; Rocklöv, J. European projections of West Nile virus transmission under climate change scenarios. One Health 2023, 16, 100509.
Published
2024-01-03
How to Cite
Sujata V. Patil. (2024). Zoonotic Disease Surveillance and Control: Safeguarding Both Animal and Human Populations. Revista Electronica De Veterinaria, 25(1), 452 - 463. Retrieved from https://www.veterinaria.org/index.php/REDVET/article/view/535
Section
Articles