Contemporary Indian Perspectives on Cultural Morality and Euthanasia Acceptability
Abstract
Contemporary Indian perspectives on cultural morality and the acceptability of euthanasia are highlights the complex interplay between traditional values, religious worldviews, and emerging social developments. In India, the foundations of cultural morality are anchored in the sacredness of life, duties to family, and shared ethical responsibilities. Historically, these values have led to a cautious stance on euthanasia, frequently linking it with moral risk, social stigma, and concerns about misuse. Religious traditions—especially Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism—provide additional nuance by stressing ideas like karma, dharma, and the natural cycle of life and death, thereby bolstering conservative perspectives in numerous communities. India, however, is slowly undergoing a change in ethical thought. Factors such as urbanization, enhanced medical literacy, exposure to worldwide discussions, and the rising focus on personal autonomy have all played a role in fostering more candid conversations about dignified dying. The significance of patient choice, quality of life, and alleviation of long-term suffering is being underscored more and more by younger demographics, healthcare workers, and educated city-dwelling populations. The 2018 Supreme Court ruling that acknowledged passive euthanasia and living wills has added legitimacy to these developing viewpoints, fostering a transition from an exclusively traditional moral framework to one that incorporates compassion, autonomy, and constitutional rights. This article seeks to analyze the changing moral landscape by identifying the main cultural, religious, and social factors that shape public attitudes; evaluating the ethical tensions between duty-based morality and individual rights; and assessing how contemporary developments are transforming debates on the acceptability of euthanasia in India. The article provides a thorough understanding of the evolution of cultural morality and its influence on India’s current discussions regarding ethical end-of-life decision-making by combining theoretical insights with contemporary societal trends.
References
2. Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India. Supreme Court of India, 2011.
3. Bhattacharyya, R. Indian Ethics and Contemporary Moral Issues. Oxford University Press, 2019.
4. Chakraborty, R. Constitutional Morality and Healthcare Decisions in India. Oxford University Press, 2020.
5. Common Cause v. Union of India. Supreme Court of India, 2018.
6. Deshpande, R. Families, Caregiving, and Medical Ethics in India. Sage Publications, 2020.
7. Fernandes, J. Christian Moral Theology and Healthcare Ethics in India. Paulist Press, 2020.
8. Gupta, R. Ethics and Medical Decision-Making in India. Oxford UP, 2019.
9. Kapur, Neela. Ethical Debates in Modern India: Healthcare, Autonomy, and Society. Routledge, 2020.
10. Kumar, S. “Psychological Distress Among Terminally Ill Patients in India.” Indian Journal of Palliative Care, vol. 22, no. 2, 2018.
11. Mehta, S. Law, Ethics, and Public Opinion in India. Sage Publications, 2021.
12. Menon, S. Culture, Family, and Medical Ethics in Contemporary India. Sage Publications, 2019.
13. Parameshwaran, E. Culture, Suffering, and Spirituality in South Asia. Sage Publications, 2020.
14. Parry, J. Death and the Moral Order in Hindu Society. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
15. Patel, A. Media, Law, and Public Sentiment: The Aruna Shanbaug Case. Routledge, 2021.
16. Ramanathan, K. Ethics, Autonomy, and End-of-Life Care in Contemporary India. Oxford University Press, 2019.
17. Rao, Anjali. Media, Morality, and End-of-Life Debates in India. Oxford University Press, 2019.
18. Rao, M. “Debating Death with Dignity in Urban India.” Social Change, vol. 50, no. 1, 2020.
19. Rao, S. “India and Euthanasia: The Poignant Case of Aruna Shanbaug.” Medical Law Review, vol. 19, no. 4, 2011.
20. Singh, Y. Law, Society, and Medical Ethics in India. Sage Publications, 2020.
21. Sunder, M. Culture, Duty, and the Ethics of Care in South Asia. Cambridge University Press, 2021.

