The Intersection of Data Privacy and International Trade Law: Analyzing Global Data Flow Regulations.
Abstract
The international data flow has become a major concern at the crossroads of data protection laws and international trade law and has both extensive and significant implications on the business and the government. Since information is increasingly being viewed as a crucial resource in technological progress and economic development, the necessity to strike a balance between the free flow of information and the privacy of personal data is a prerequisite of worldwide trade. This paper will examine the legal and policy issues that have been brought about by differences in national regulations on data protection with special attention to the data localization laws, jurisdiction issue, extraterritoriality, and the involvement of the private sector in regulatory environments. The paper shows how these regulatory differences interfere with cross-border data flows and make international trade more complicated through extensive case studies, such as the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, India Personal Data Protection Bill, and China Cybersecurity Law. The discussion focuses on the conflict between trade liberalization and data sovereignty, and specifically in emerging markets where data localization has become the most important policy instrument. This paper proposes potential solutions for harmonizing data protection laws, such as the development of multilateral agreements and global frameworks that promote both privacy protection and trade facilitation. The long-term effects of the emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and blockchain, which are transforming the regulatory environment of data governance, are also described in the discussion. The results emphasize the importance of global collaboration to develop a set of unified, adaptable data privacy regulations that allow unimpeded data transfer without violating the rights of an individual in the digital economy.
References
o Kuner, C. (2017). The General Data Protection Regulation: A Commentary. Oxford University Press.
o Laudon, K.C., & Laudon, J.P. (2020). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
o Greenleaf, G., & Waters, N. (2014). Global Data Privacy Laws: A Comparative Analysis. Privacy Laws & Business International Report, 88, 19-21.
o EU-U.S. Privacy Shield. (2016). Decision (EU) 2016/1250 of the European Commission. Official Journal of the European Union.
o Schrems II - Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), Case C-311/18, Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner, Judgment, 16 July 2020. https://curia.europa.eu
o General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Official Journal of the European Union, 4 May 2016.
o China’s Cybersecurity Law (2017). National People’s Congress of China. http://www.npc.gov.cn/
o India’s Personal Data Protection Bill (2019). Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India. https://meity.gov.in
o Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). (2018). https://www.cptpp.org/
o United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). (2020). https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/usmca
o World Trade Organization (WTO). (2019). Joint Statement on E-commerce. https://www.wto.org
o OECD. (2019). Privacy and Data Protection in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org
o APEC. (2018). Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. https://www.apec.org
o World Economic Forum. (2020). The Global Risks Report 2020. Geneva: World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org
o European Commission. (2021). Data Protection and Privacy. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en
o Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 (PDPB), Legislative Bill in India. https://www.prsindia.org/