A Forensic And Multidisciplinary Inquiry Into Corporate Malfeasance Within The Indian Optical Market: Structural Dynamics, Compliance Evasion, And Ethical Breach Analysis

  • Mr. Ajay Nagar
  • Dr. Monika Rastogi
Keywords: Corporate Malfeasance, Indian Optical Industry, Forensic Accounting, Compliance Evasion, Ethical Breaches, Regulatory Failure, Corporate Governance, Market Manipulation, Organizational Misconduct, Consumer Protection, Transparency, Accountability,, Multidisciplinary Analysis

Abstract

A forensic and multidisciplinary inquiry into corporate malfeasance within the Indian optical market uncovers a complex web of structural inefficiencies, regulatory shortcomings, and ethical lapses that collectively enable a range of illicit practices. The study integrates perspectives from forensic accounting, corporate governance, legal analysis, and ethical theory to investigate how businesses within the sector manipulate systemic weaknesses for financial and competitive gain. By analyzing real-world case studies alongside statistical data, the research reveals how the concentration of market power, ambiguous regulatory frameworks, and insufficient oversight create conditions that foster corporate misconduct. Corporate malfeasance in this domain often manifests through various evasion tactics, including falsification of financial statements, misreporting of revenue, manipulation of supply chains, and the deliberate exploitation of loopholes within compliance and reporting mechanisms. These activities are not isolated but represent deeply embedded patterns within certain organizational cultures that prioritize profit over legality and ethical responsibility. Such misconduct not only threatens market fairness but also erodes stakeholder trust, impacting consumers, smaller competitors, regulatory institutions, and the broader economic ecosystem. The inquiry further investigates the ethical breaches committed by corporate actors, examining how compromised internal controls, lack of accountability, and weak ethical leadership contribute to a pervasive culture of non-compliance. Ethical violations are contextualized within a broader organizational and institutional framework, illustrating how systemic failures often reinforce unethical behavior. In response to these challenges, the study calls for a more proactive and coordinated regulatory approach that combines rigorous oversight with capacity-building measures for ethical compliance. Strengthening transparency, reforming audit and reporting standards, and fostering an internal culture of accountability are identified as essential strategies for long-term sectoral reform. Furthermore, the research emphasizes the importance of cross-sector collaboration—bringing together regulators, corporate entities, forensic experts, and consumer advocacy groups—to establish robust mechanisms for early detection and prevention of malpractice. Ultimately, the inquiry advocates for a resilient, transparent, and ethically governed optical market in India. Such a transformation is crucial not only for protecting consumer interests and promoting fair competition but also for ensuring sustainable growth and public trust in one of India’s rapidly expanding healthcare and consumer goods sectors.

Author Biographies

Mr. Ajay Nagar

Research Scholor, School of Law, Lingaya’s Vidyapeeth (Deemed to Be University), Faridabad (Haryana)

Dr. Monika Rastogi

Head & Senior Professor, School of Law, Lingaya’s Vidyapeeth (Deemed to Be University), Faridabad (Haryana)

References

• Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
• Chaudhuri, S., & Gupta, A. (2020). Corporate ethical breaches and organizational culture: An Indian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(4), 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04191-x
• Fernandes, P., & Sinha, D. (2017). Whistleblower protection in Indian companies: Challenges and reforms. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 4(2), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.10
• Kumar, V., & Singh, R. (2018). Leadership and ethical decision-making in Indian corporations. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0021-5
• Menon, S., & Krishnan, J. (2019). Regulatory enforcement inefficiencies in India: Resource constraints and procedural delays. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 55(3), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-019-09328-x
• Sundaram, R., & Rao, P. (2019). Market concentration and corporate ethics in Indian industries. Economic and Political Weekly, 54(12), 36–44.
• Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., & Albrecht, C. O. (2011). Fraud examination (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2022). Report to the nations: Global study on occupational fraud and abuse. ACFE.
• Beekes, W., & Brown, P. (2006). Do better-governed Australian firms make more informative disclosures? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(3–4), 422–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00588.x
• Cohen, J., Ding, Y., Lesage, C., & Stolowy, H. (2018). Corporate fraud and managers’ behavior: Evidence from earnings restatements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(2–3), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.07.001
• Dechow, P. M., & Skinner, D. J. (2000). Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2000.14.2.235
• Dyck, A., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2010). Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? The Journal of Finance, 65(6), 2213–2253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01644.x
• Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
• Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.365
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00065-9
• Lennox, C., & Pittman, J. (2011). Big five audits and accounting fraud. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 161–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01043.x
• OECD. (2017). Corporate governance and business integrity: A stocktaking of corporate practices. OECD Publishing.
• Palmrose, Z. V., Richardson, V. J., & Scholz, S. (2004). Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(1), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.12.002
• Rezaee, Z. (2005). Causes, consequences, and deterrence of financial statement fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(3), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00072-4
• Sikka, P. (2008). Enterprise culture and accountancy firms: New masters of the universe. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(2), 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810854460
• Spalding, A. D., & Oddo, A. R. (2011). Earnings management and its consequences. Business Horizons, 54(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.10.002
• Transparency International. (2021). Corruption perceptions index 2021. Transparency International.
• Wells, J. T. (2014). Corporate fraud handbook: Prevention and detection (5th ed.). Wiley.
• Zeff, S. A. (2003). How the U.S. accounting profession got where it is today: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.3.189
Published
2024-07-30
How to Cite
Mr. Ajay Nagar, & Dr. Monika Rastogi. (2024). A Forensic And Multidisciplinary Inquiry Into Corporate Malfeasance Within The Indian Optical Market: Structural Dynamics, Compliance Evasion, And Ethical Breach Analysis. Revista Electronica De Veterinaria, 25(1), 4054-4062. https://doi.org/10.69980/redvet.v25i1.2063
Section
Articles