Diversity Of Aquatic Macrophytes In Komati Cheruvu And Ensanpally Pond Of Siddipet District
Abstract
The objective of this study is to examine the Aquatic macrophytes of Komati Cheruvu, located in Siddipet (Mandal and District), Telangana state. The experiment on the identification of macrophytes was conducted from January 2024 to March 2024. The macrophytes sourced from the locale were identified and categorized into submerged, floating, and emergent forms of life:
The recorded genera were studied. Macrophytes are large aquatic plants belonging to diverse taxonomic groups, adapted morphologically, anatomically and physiologically to thrive in aquatic habitats such as freshwater, brackish water or seawater. An assemblage of macrophytic vegetation consists of emergent species, whose vegetative parts rise above the water surface, as well as submerged and floating species. Each ecological group has distinct morphological and physiological characteristics. Research should be undertaken to scientifically study and extract important constituents from lesser-known flora by collaborating with indigenous people.
This will allow for the identification of useful species that could further contribute to human welfare. Macrophytes are vital components of aquatic food webs and perform numerous ecological functions within water ecosystems. Their diverse roles highlight the need for conservation of aquatic resources and biodiversity, as these plants not only provide essential ecosystem services but also contribute to ecological balance and local livelihoods.
References
2. Boyd, C.E. (1968). Freshwater plants: a potential source of protein. Econ. Bot., 22:359-68
3. Boylen, C.W. and Sheldon, R.B. (1976). Submergent Macrophytes: grow under winter ice
cover. Science, 194:841-842.
4. Cook, C.D.K. (1974). Water plants of the world. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.
5. Deshkar, S. L. (2008). Avifaunal Diversity and Ecology of wetlands in Semi-arid zone of
central Gujarat with reference to the Conservation and Categorization. Ph.D. Thesis, M.S
University, Vadodora.
6. Dhote, S. and Dikshit, S. (2007). Water quality improvement through macrophytes: A Case
Study.Asian T. Env. Sci.: 21 (2): 427-430.
7. Elger, A. and Will, N.J. (2003). Leaf dry matter Content as an integrative Expression of plant
palatability: the case of fresh water macrophytes. Functional Ecology,17: 58-65.
8. Fassett, N.C. (1957). A Manual of Aquatic Plants. The University of Wisconsin Press (Ltd.),
London.
9. Hutchinson, G.E. (1975). A Treatise on Limnology, Limnological Bot., Vol. 3: John Wiley.
10. Mishra, K.L. (1974). Manual of plant Ecology.Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi,
11. Nimat, R. and Jafri, A. K. (1984). Preliminary observations on the use of water hyacinth
(Eichhoniacrassipes) leaf meal as protein source in fish feeds. Curr. Sci., 53: 338-340.
12. Rickel, B. W. (1975). The Effectiveness of the Tilapia zillii in controlling aquatic vegetation in
Southwesternpond.M. S. Thesis, University of Arizona, Tuscan. Santiago, C.B., Aldaba, M.B.,
Laron, M.A. and Reyes, O.S.
13. Sen, D.N. and Chatarjee, U. N. (1959). Ecological studies on aquaqtic and swampy vegetation
Of Gorakpur. A survey.Agra University Res. (Sci), 8: 17-27.
14. Shailaja, A. and Aruna, M. (2023). Diversity of aquatic macrophytes in nagaram pond and
Dubbak pond of Siddipet district, Telangana. International Journal of novel Research and Development, ISSN: 2456-4184, Vol.8, Issue 12, pp.d492-d498.
15. Swati Chaurasia (2022).Role of Macrophytes: A Review, Advances in Zoology and Botany, 10(4): 75- 81 (DOI: 10.13189/azb.2022.100401)
16. Vyas, L.N. (1964). A study of the hydrophytes and marsh plants of Alwar.J. Indian Bot. Soc.,
43: 17- 19.
