Dams And Development- An Understanding Of Geologic, Socio-Economic And Environmental Impacts
Abstract
Over 40 million people are said to have been relocated in India over the course of the previous 60 years due to the construction of 4,300 major dams. India currently has a serious water scarcity that affects domestic, industrial, and agricultural use. This is mostly the result of inadequate storage and ineffective water management. Recent patterns in decreased reservoir capacity seem to be a result of social and environmental opposition to developments as well as the necessity to restrict resettlement. In the light of advancement, there are numerous adverse social and environmental impacts being imposed on the habitants of the river basins. However, the regulatory authorities are enhancing the procedures to ensure that environmental and social repercussions are appropriately reviewed and controlled while being created to promote growth in order to ensure that the lessons of the past are learned and mistakes are avoided, or at least reduced.
It is presumable that development at the national level affects project planning and practices through the creation of laws and policies, but it is individual projects where laws and policies actually take effect, where actual changes to higher social and environmental standards become evident, and possibly where these changes have cascading effects. Two policy areas will be examined for norm evolution and implementation: firstly, the use of environmental impact assessment along with the socio-economic effects on the lives of the people as a tool for planning and making decisions on dams; and secondly, the analysis of the resettlement policies such as the National Rehabilitation policy of 2007.
References
2. Anderson DH, et al. Proximate and distant visitors: differences in importance ratings of beneficial experiences. J Park Recreat Admin. 2008;26(4):47-65.
3. Asmal K. Introduction: World Commission on Dams report, dams and development. Am U Int'l L Rev. 2000;16:1411.
4. Baird IG, Meach M. Sesan River fisheries monitoring in Ratanakiri province, northeast Cambodia: before and after construction of the Yali Falls dam in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Ban Lung, Cambodia: 3S Rivers Protection Network, GAPE; 2005.
5. Baran E, Jantunen T, Chong CK. Values of inland fisheries in the Mekong River Basin. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: WorldFish Center; 2007.
6. Bartolome LJ, et al. Displacement, resettlement, rehabilitation, reparation, and development: China report, World Commission on Dams Thematic Review 1.3. Cape Town: World Commission on Dams; 2000.
7. Beck MW, Claassen AH, Hundt PJ. Environmental and livelihood impacts of dams: common lessons across development gradients that challenge sustainability. Int J River Basin Manag. 2012;10(1):73-92.
8. Biswas AK, Tortajada C. Development and large dams: a global perspective. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 2001;17(1):9-21.
9. Bocking S. Dams & Development. International Development Studies Network. 1998. Accessed December 1, 2007.
10. Bodaly RA, Hecky RE, Fudge RJP. Increases in fish mercury levels in lakes flooded by the Churchill River diversion, northern Manitoba. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1984;41(4):682-691.
11. Boxer B. Contradictions and challenges in China’s water policy development. Water Int. 2001;26(3):335-341.
12. Brown PH, Tullos D, Tilt B, Magee D, Wolf AT. Modeling the costs and benefits of dam construction from a multidisciplinary perspective. J Environ Manage. 2009;90
13. Burdge RJ, Vanclay F. Social impact assessment: a contribution to the state of the art series. Impact Assess. 1996;14(1):59-86.
14. Cakmak C. The role of dams in development. 2001.
15. Chapman MA. Human impacts on the Waikato river system, New Zealand. Cejournal. 1996;40(1-2):85-99.
16. Choudhury N. Sustainable dam development in India between global norms and local practices. Discussion Paper. 2010;(10/2010).
17. Duckworth JW, et al. A new species of wagtail from the Lower Mekong Basin. Bull Br Ornithol Club. 2001;121(3):152-182.
18. Dwivedi R. Resisting dams and ‘development’: contemporary significance of the campaign against the Narmada projects in India. Eur J Dev Res. 1998;10(2):135-183.
19. Egre D, Senecal P. Social impact assessments of large dams throughout the world: lessons learned over two decades. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 2003;21(3):215-224.
20. Environmental management. National Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy, 2007 – Environmental management.
21. Fuggle R, Smith WT. Large dams in water and energy resource development in The People’s Republic of China, World Commission on Dams Country Review Paper. Cape Town: World Commission on Dams; 2000.
22. Garrett BL. Drowned memories: the submerged places of the Winnemem Wintu. Archaeologies. 2010;6(2):346-371.
23. Hartje V, Horstmann K. Dams and development co-operation: experiences and perspectives in German development co-operation with selected topics. Berlin, Dortmund; 1999.
24. Kingsford RT. Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecol. 2000;25(2):109-127.
25. Kotchen MJ, Moore MR, Lupi F, Rutherford ES. Environmental constraints on hydropower: an ex post benefit-cost analysis of dam relicensing in Michigan. Land Econ. 2006;82(3):384-403.
26. Kumar P, Dubey CS, Kumar O, Shekhar S, Shukla DP, Ramanathan AL. Deciphering the role of meteorological parameters controlling the sediment load and water discharge in the Sutlej basin, Western Himalaya. J Environ Manage. 2021;298:113413.
27. Lerer LB, Scudder T. Health impacts of large dams. Environ Impact Assess Rev.1999;19(2):113-123.
28. Mäkinen K, Khan S. Policy considerations for greenhouse gas emissions from freshwater reservoirs. Water Altern. 2010;3(2):91-105.
29. McCartney M. Living with dams: managing the environmental impacts. Water Policy. 2009;11(S1):121-139.
30. McCartney MP, Sullivan C, Acreman MC, McAllister DE. Ecosystem impacts of large dams. Background paper, 2; 2001.
31. McDonald K, Bosshard P, Brewer N. Exporting dams: China’s hydropower industry goes global. J Environ Manage. 2009;90(S3)
32. McDonald K. Damming China’s grand canyon: pluralization without democratization in the Nu River Valley [dissertation]. University of California; 2007.
33. Moore D, Dore J, Gyawali D. Special issue: WCD+10: revisiting the large dam controversy. Water Altern. 2010;3(2):1-474.
34. Mumba M, Thompson JR. Hydrological and ecological impacts of dams on the Kafue Flats floodplain system, Southern Zambia. Phys Chem Earth. 2005;30:442-447.
35. Rana N, Sati SP, Sundriyal YP, Doval MM, Juyal N. Socio-economic and environmental implications of the hydroelectric projects in Uttarakhand Himalaya, India. J Mountain Sci. 2007;4:344-353.
36. Schulz C, Adams WM. Debating dams: the World Commission on Dams 20 years on. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water. 2019;6(5).
37. Scott CA, Pierce SA, Pasqualetti MJ, Jones AL, Montz BE, Hoover JH. Policy and institutional dimensions of the water–energy nexus. Energy Policy. 2011;39(10):6622-6630.
38. Scudder T. The future of large dams: dealing with social, environmental, institutional and political costs. London: Earthscan; 2005.
39. Sengupta A. Dams and development: a controversy. Available at: SSRN 2124369; 2009.
40. Sharma SC, Kakoty N. Need for development of hydropower and dams in India highlighting the associated environmental issues. Water and Energy Abstracts. 2004;14(2):123.
41. Siddiqi A, Anadon LD. The water–energy nexus in Middle East and North Africa. Energy Policy. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.023.
42. St Louis VL, Kelly CA, Duchemin E, Rudd JWM, Rosenberg DM. Reservoir surfaces as sources of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere: a global estimate. BioScience. 2000;50(9):766-775.
43. Tortajada C. Dams: an essential component of development. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. 2015;20(1)
44. Tullos D, Tilt B, Liermann CR. Introduction to the special issue: Understanding and linking the biophysical, socioeconomic and geopolitical effects of dams. J Environ Manage. 2009;90
45. Woodruff DS. Biogeography and conservation in Southeast Asia: how 2.7 million years of repeated environmental fluctuations affect today’s patterns and the future of the remaining refugial-phase biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv. 2010;19(4):919-941.
46. World Commission on Dams. Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making: The Report of the World Commission on Dams. Earthscan; 2000.
47. World Commission on Dams. Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making. London: Earthscan; 2000.
48. Yang Z, et al. Dam impacts on the Changjiang (Yangtze) river sediment discharge to the sea: the past 55 years and after the Three Gorges Dam. Water Resour Res. 2006;42.
49. Zakova Z, Berankova D, Kockova E, Kriz P, Mlejnkova H, Lind OT. Investigation of the development of biological and chemical conditions in the Vir reservoir 30 years after impoundment. Water Sci Technol. 1993;28:65-74.