Assessment Methods In Blended Engineering Courses
Abstract
In order to keep up with the ever-changing nature of the classroom, engineering schools that use blended learning strategies must rethink their assessment practices. This abstract dives into a study of evaluation strategies developed specifically for online engineering hybrid classes. To meet the specific requirements of engineering fields, it includes a review of various assessment methods, such as conventional exams, online exams, project-based evaluations, and collaborative assessments. The performance of these strategies in evaluating blended learners' understanding, problem-solving, and practical-skills capacities is also explored in the abstract. Furthermore, it delves into how different evaluation methods affect student involvement, learning results, and the efficacy of education as a whole. In order to better prepare students for the modern engineering profession and to promote holistic learning experiences, this abstract seeks to offer insights into optimizing evaluation practices in blended engineering courses by conducting an in-depth analysis of these assessment methodologies.
References
2. Askar, P. (2005) Distance education in Turkey. In C. Howard, J. Boettcher, L. Justice, K. Shenk, P. L. Rogers & G. A. Berg (Eds) Encyclopedia of distance learning: Vol 2 (pp. 635–640) Hershey, PA, Idea
3. Group Inc.
4. Bartley, J.M. (2006) Assessment is as assessment does: a conceptual framework for understanding online assessment and measurement. In Mary Hricko and Scott L. Howell (eds.), Online Assessment and Measurement Foundations and Challenges (pp. 1-45). Information Science Publishing.
5. Benson, A.D. (2003). Assessing participant learning in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 69-78.
6. Brown, S., Race, P., & Bull, J. (Eds.). (1999). Computer-assisted assessment in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
7. Hanson, J., Millington, C., & Freewood, M. (2001). Developing a Methodology for Online
8. Feedback and Assessment. Paper presented at the Fifth International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, Leicestershire, U.K.
9. HEC (2009). Turkish Higher Education Council, Retrieved May 30, 2009, from
10. http://www.yok.gov.tr/content/view/480/183/lang,tr/
11. Hodgson, P. (2006, December). Achieving enriched learning experience through blending computermediated and conventional assessment methods. Paper presented at the Evaluations and Assessment Conference, Australia. Retrieved May 30, 2009, from
12. http://otl.curtin.edu.au/eac2006/papers/hodgson.pdf
13. Liang, X. & Kim, C. (2004). Classroom assessment in web-based instructional environment:
14. instructors’ experience. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(7). Retrieved March 23, 2009 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=7
15. MoNE (2007). National Education Statistics Formal Education 2006-2007. Ankara: MoNE.
16. Ozkul, A. E. (2001). Anadolu University Distance Education System from Emergence to 21st Century. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Learning, 2(1), Retrieved January 12, 2009, from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde3/2/ekremtxt.htm
17. QAA (Quality Assurance Agency) (2006). Section 6: Assessment of students. Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from http://www.qaa.ac.uk
18. Reeves, T. C. (2000). Alternative Assessment Approaches for Online Learning Environments in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 101–111.
19. Ross, J. A. & Ross, M. (2005). Student assessment in online courses: Research and practice, 1993- 2004. The Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 31(2), 43-63