Ethical Frameworks in Veterinary Medicine: Navigating Complexities for Improved Animal Welfare and Human Health
Abstract
Ethical considerations form the bedrock of veterinary medicine, serving as the guiding principles for practitioners in navigating the intricate landscape of animal care and human health. This paper explores the multifaceted nature of ethical frameworks within veterinary medicine, emphasizing their critical role in enhancing both animal welfare and human health outcomes. The first section delves into the foundational principles that underpin ethical decision-making in veterinary practice. It highlights the significance of principles such as beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and autonomy in guiding veterinarians through complex clinical scenarios. By adhering to these principles, veterinarians can ensure that their actions prioritize the well-being of animals while respecting the autonomy and rights of their human clients. The second section examines the ethical challenges inherent in balancing the interests of individual animals with those of larger populations and ecosystems. It discusses the concept of One Health, which underscores the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health, and advocates for a collaborative approach to address shared health challenges. Additionally, it explores dilemmas related to resource allocation, triage, and the ethical implications of emerging technologies in veterinary medicine. The third section explores the ethical considerations surrounding animal research and experimentation. It discusses the principles of replacement, reduction, and refinement (the 3Rs) as guiding principles for ethical research involving animals, emphasizing the importance of minimizing harm and maximizing benefit. Furthermore, it addresses the ethical complexities of end-of-life care, euthanasia, and decision-making in situations of suffering and terminal illness.
References
[2] Rollin, B.E. Veterinary medical ethics ethical question of the month July 2010. Can. Vet. J. 2010, 51, 685–688.
[3] Baguley, J. Companion Animal Veterinary Services in Australia: Environment, Marketing Practices and Performance; University of Western Sydney: Parramatta, NSW, Australia, 2009.
[4] Ipsos-Reid. Paws and Claws: A Syndicated Study on Canadian Pet Ownership; Ipsos-Reid: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2001.
[5] Kipperman, B.S.; Kass, P.H.; Rishniw, M. Factors that influence small animal veterinarians’ opinions and actions regarding cost of care and effects of economic limitations on patient care and outcome and professional career satisfaction and burnout. Javma J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2017, 250, 785–794.
[6] Anderson, S.; Stevenson, M.A.; Boller, M. Pet health insurance reduces the likelihood of pre-surgical euthanasia of dogs with gastric dilatation-volvulus in the emergency room of an Australian referral hospital. N. Z. Vet. J. 2021, 69, 267–273.
[7] Boller, M.; Nemanic, T.S.; Anthonisz, J.D.; Awad, M.; Selinger, J.; Boller, E.M.; Stevenson, M.A. The effect of pet insurance on presurgical euthanasia of dogs with gastric dilatation-volvulus: A novel approach to quantifying economic euthanasia in veterinary emergency medicine. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 1039.
[8] Springer, S.; Sandøe, P.; Grimm, H.; Corr, S.A.; Kristensen, A.T.; Lund, T.B. Managing conflicting ethical concerns in modern small animal practice—A comparative study of veterinarian’s decision ethics in Austria, Denmark and the UK. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0253420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[9] Fingland, R.B.; Stone, L.R.; Read, E.K.; Moore, R.M. Preparing veterinary students for excellence in general practice: Building confidence and competence by focusing on spectrum of care. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2021, 259, 463–470.
[10] Cimarelli, G.; Marshall-Pescini, S.; Range, F.; Virányi, Z. Pet dogs’ relationships vary rather individually than according to partner’s species. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3437.
[11] Lue, T.W.; Pantenburg, D.P.; Crawford, P.M. Impact of the owner-pet and client-veterinarian bond on the care that pets receive. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2008, 232, 531–540.
[12] Kirk, C.P. Dogs have masters, cats have staff: Consumers’ psychological ownership and their economic valuation of pets. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 99, 306–318.
[13] Volk, J.O.; Felsted, K.E.; Thomas, J.G.; Siren, C.W. Executive summary of the Bayer veterinary care usage study. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2011, 238, 1275–1282.
[14] Springer, S.; Sandøe, P.; Grimm, H.; Corr, S.A.; Kristensen, A.T.; Lund, T.B. Managing conflicting ethical concerns in modern small animal practice—A comparative study of veterinarian’s decision ethics in Austria, Denmark and the UK. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0253420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Monaghan, H.; Rohlf, V.; Scotney, R.; Bennett, P. Compassion fatigue in people who care for animals: An investigation of risk and protective factors. Traumatology 2020, 24, 186.
[16] Rohlf, V.I. Interventions for occupational stress and compassion fatigue in animal care professionals—A systematic review. Traumatology 2018, 24, 186–192.
[17] Black, A.F.; Winefield, H.R.; Chur-Hansen, A. Occupational stress in veterinary nurses: Roles of the work environment and own companion animal. Anthrozoös 2015, 24, 191.
