Dual Wide-Band Polarization Insensitive Metamaterial Absorber Based on Concentric Split-Ring and Circular Ring Resonators
Keywords:
Metamaterial absorber, dual-band, polarization insensitive, split-ring resonator, circular ring resonator, electromagnetic interference
Abstract
This paper presents a novel dual wide-band polarization insensitive metamaterial absorber design incorporating concentric split-ring resonators (CSRRs) and circular ring resonators (CRRs). The proposed structure demonstrates exceptional absorption performance across two distinct frequency bands while maintaining polarization independence and wide-angle stability. Through comprehensive electromagnetic simulations and equivalent circuit modeling, we achieve absorption rates exceeding 90% in both operational bands. The design exhibits robust performance for oblique incidence angles up to 60° and maintains consistent absorption characteristics regardless of polarization orientation. The metamaterial unit cell comprises a three-layer configuration with optimized geometric parameters to ensure dual-band operation. This work contributes significantly to the advancement of metamaterial absorbers for applications in electromagnetic interference shielding, radar cross-section reduction, and sensing technologies.
References
1. M. Zhong, “Design and measurement of a narrow band metamaterial absorber in terahertz range,” Optical Materials, vol. 100, p. 109712, 2020.
2. W. Shahzad, W. Hu, Q. Ali, H. Raza, S. M. Abbas, and L. P. Ligthart, “A low-cost metamaterial sensor based on DS-CSRR for material characterization applications,” Sensors, vol. 22, p. 2000, 2022.
3. W. Xu, L. Xie, and Y. Ying, “Mechanisms and applications of terahertz metamaterial sensing: A review,” Nanoscale, vol. 9, pp. 13864–13878, 2017.
4. Y. U. Lee, C. Posner, J. Zhao, J. Zhang, and Z. Liu, “Imaging of cell morphology changes via metamaterial-assisted photobleaching microscopy,” Nano Letters, vol. 21, pp. 1716–1721, 2021.
6. W. Fang, F.-k. Zhou, Y.-j. Wang, and P. Chen, “Broadband, wide-angle, polarization-independent and lightweight low-scattering coding metamaterial based on stereo meta-atoms,” Results in Physics, vol. 20, p. 103687, 2021.
7. Y. Yang et al., “Veselago lensing with Weyl metamaterials,” Optica, vol. 8, pp. 249–254, 2021.
8. N. Misran, S. H. Yusop, M. T. Islam, and M. Y. Ismail, “Analysis of parameterization substrate thickness and permittivity for concentric split ring square reflectarray element,” Jurnal Kejuruteraan (Journal of Engineering), vol. 23, pp. 11–16, 2012.
9. J. Liu et al., “Biaxial hyperbolic metamaterial THz broadband absorber utilizing anisotropic two-dimensional materials,” Results in Physics, vol. 22, p. 103818, 2021.
10. T. Luo et al., “A three-dimensional polarization independent invisibility cloak by using multiband zero refraction metamaterials,” Laser Physics, vol. 31, p. 116204, 2021.
11. T. A. M. L. Hakim et al., “Elliptical Slot Metasurface High Gain Microstrip Line Antenna for Sub-6 GHz 5G Wireless Communication,” in Proc. 2021 7th Int. Conf. Space Sci. Commun. (IconSpace), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2021, pp. 156–160.
12. T. Alam et al., “Metamaterial array based meander line planar antenna for cube satellite communication,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, pp. 1–12, 2021.
13. T. Alam, M. T. Islam, and M. Cho, “Near-zero metamaterial inspired UHF antenna for nanosatellite communication system,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, pp. 1–15, 2019.
14. M. L. Hakim et al., “Polarization insensitivity characterization of dual-band perfect metamaterial absorber for K band sensing applications,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, pp. 1–14, 2021.
15. J. Sol, D. R. Smith, and P. Del Hougne, “Meta-programmable analog differentiator,” Nature Communications, vol. 13, pp. 1–10, 2022.
16. R. K. Mishra, R. D. Gupta, and S. Datar, “Metamaterial microwave absorber (MMA) for electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding in X-Band,” Plasmonics, vol. 16, pp. 2061–2071, 2021.
17. N. I. Landy et al., “Perfect metamaterial absorber,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, p. 207402, 2008.
18. C. M. Watts, X. Liu, and W. J. Padilla, “Metamaterial electromagnetic wave absorbers,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, pp. OP98–OP120, 2012.
19. M. F. Imani, D. R. Smith, and P. del Hougne, “Perfect absorption in a disordered medium with programmable meta-atom inclusions,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 30, p. 2005310, 2020.
20. V. S. Asadchy et al., “Broadband reflectionless metasheets: Frequency-selective transmission and perfect absorption,” Physical Review X, vol. 5, p. 031005, 2015.
21. H. Mei et al., “Metamaterial absorbers towards broadband, polarization insensitivity and tunability,” Optics & Laser Technology, vol. 147, p. 107627, 2022.
22. W. Li et al., “The RCS reduction of microstrip antenna design based on multi-band metamaterial absorber,” in Proc. 2015 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Workshop Series (IMWS-AMP), Suzhou, China, 2015, pp. 1–3.
23. M. Edries et al., “A Tri-band metamaterial absorber for radar cross section reduction,” International Journal of Microwave and Optical Technology, vol. 16, pp. 184–191, 2021.
24. O. Gunduz and C. Sabah, “Polarization angle independent perfect multiband metamaterial absorber and energy harvesting application,” Journal of Computational Electronics, vol. 15, pp. 228–238, 2016.
25. R. K. Singh and A. Gupta, “A wrenched-square shaped polarization independent and wide angle stable ultra-thin metamaterial absorber for S-band, X-band and Ku-band applications,” AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, vol. 132, p. 153648, 2021.
26. B. C. Zhou et al., “An ultrathin and broadband radar absorber using metamaterials,” Waves in Random and Complex Media, vol. 31, pp. 911–920, 2021.
27. C.-S. Ri et al., “Bandwidth analysis of microwave metamaterial absorber with a resistive frequency selective surface by using an equivalent circuit model,” AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, vol. 148, p. 154160, 2022.
28. M. L. Hakim et al., “Polarization insensitive symmetrical structured double negative (DNG) metamaterial absorber for Ku-band sensing applications,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, pp. 1–18, 2022.
29. C. Zhang et al., “Design and analysis of a polarization-independent and incident angle insensitive triple-band metamaterial absorber,” Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, vol. 138, p. 115131, 2022.
30. M. A. Shukoor, V. Kumar, and S. Dey, “Compact polarisation insensitive wide angular stable triple band absorber for RF energy harvesting, RCS reduction, and sensor applications,” International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 31, e22763, 2021.
31. M. Bakır et al., “Microwave metamaterial absorber for sensing applications,” Opto-Electronics Review, vol. 25, pp. 318–325, 2017.
32. F. Dincer et al., “Multi-band polarization independent cylindrical metamaterial absorber and sensor application,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 30, p. 1650095, 2016.
33. A. Hoque et al., “A polarization independent quasi-TEM metamaterial absorber for X and Ku band sensing applications,” Sensors, vol. 18, p. 4209, 2018.
34. H. Huang et al., “Design of broadband graphene-metamaterial absorbers for permittivity sensing at mid-infrared regions,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, pp. 1–10, 2018.
35. W. Zhang, J.-Y. Li, and J. Xie, “High sensitivity refractive index sensor based on metamaterial absorber,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research M, vol. 71, pp. 107–115, 2018.
36. Y. Zhang et al., “Microwave metamaterial absorber for non-destructive sensing applications of grain,” Sensors, vol. 18, p. 1912, 2018.
37. A. Salim and S. Lim, “Review of recent metamaterial microfluidic sensors,” Sensors, vol. 18, p. 232, 2018.
38. D. Prakash and N. Gupta, “Applications of metamaterial sensors: A review,” International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies, vol. 14, pp. 19–33, 2022.
39. S. Ayhan et al., “Radar-based high-accuracy angle measurement sensor operating in the K-band,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 15, pp. 937–945, 2014.
40. Z. Li et al., “Microwaves sensor for wind turbine blade inspection,” Applied Composite Materials, vol. 24, pp. 495–512, 2017.
41. R. Xu et al., “Actively logical modulation of MEMS-based terahertz metamaterial,” Photonics Research, vol. 9, pp. 1409–1415, 2021.
42. M. L. Hakim et al., “Wide-oblique-incident-angle stable polarization-insensitive ultra-wideband metamaterial perfect absorber for visible optical wavelength applications,” Materials, vol. 15, p. 2201, 2022.
2. W. Shahzad, W. Hu, Q. Ali, H. Raza, S. M. Abbas, and L. P. Ligthart, “A low-cost metamaterial sensor based on DS-CSRR for material characterization applications,” Sensors, vol. 22, p. 2000, 2022.
3. W. Xu, L. Xie, and Y. Ying, “Mechanisms and applications of terahertz metamaterial sensing: A review,” Nanoscale, vol. 9, pp. 13864–13878, 2017.
4. Y. U. Lee, C. Posner, J. Zhao, J. Zhang, and Z. Liu, “Imaging of cell morphology changes via metamaterial-assisted photobleaching microscopy,” Nano Letters, vol. 21, pp. 1716–1721, 2021.
6. W. Fang, F.-k. Zhou, Y.-j. Wang, and P. Chen, “Broadband, wide-angle, polarization-independent and lightweight low-scattering coding metamaterial based on stereo meta-atoms,” Results in Physics, vol. 20, p. 103687, 2021.
7. Y. Yang et al., “Veselago lensing with Weyl metamaterials,” Optica, vol. 8, pp. 249–254, 2021.
8. N. Misran, S. H. Yusop, M. T. Islam, and M. Y. Ismail, “Analysis of parameterization substrate thickness and permittivity for concentric split ring square reflectarray element,” Jurnal Kejuruteraan (Journal of Engineering), vol. 23, pp. 11–16, 2012.
9. J. Liu et al., “Biaxial hyperbolic metamaterial THz broadband absorber utilizing anisotropic two-dimensional materials,” Results in Physics, vol. 22, p. 103818, 2021.
10. T. Luo et al., “A three-dimensional polarization independent invisibility cloak by using multiband zero refraction metamaterials,” Laser Physics, vol. 31, p. 116204, 2021.
11. T. A. M. L. Hakim et al., “Elliptical Slot Metasurface High Gain Microstrip Line Antenna for Sub-6 GHz 5G Wireless Communication,” in Proc. 2021 7th Int. Conf. Space Sci. Commun. (IconSpace), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2021, pp. 156–160.
12. T. Alam et al., “Metamaterial array based meander line planar antenna for cube satellite communication,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, pp. 1–12, 2021.
13. T. Alam, M. T. Islam, and M. Cho, “Near-zero metamaterial inspired UHF antenna for nanosatellite communication system,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, pp. 1–15, 2019.
14. M. L. Hakim et al., “Polarization insensitivity characterization of dual-band perfect metamaterial absorber for K band sensing applications,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, pp. 1–14, 2021.
15. J. Sol, D. R. Smith, and P. Del Hougne, “Meta-programmable analog differentiator,” Nature Communications, vol. 13, pp. 1–10, 2022.
16. R. K. Mishra, R. D. Gupta, and S. Datar, “Metamaterial microwave absorber (MMA) for electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding in X-Band,” Plasmonics, vol. 16, pp. 2061–2071, 2021.
17. N. I. Landy et al., “Perfect metamaterial absorber,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, p. 207402, 2008.
18. C. M. Watts, X. Liu, and W. J. Padilla, “Metamaterial electromagnetic wave absorbers,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, pp. OP98–OP120, 2012.
19. M. F. Imani, D. R. Smith, and P. del Hougne, “Perfect absorption in a disordered medium with programmable meta-atom inclusions,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 30, p. 2005310, 2020.
20. V. S. Asadchy et al., “Broadband reflectionless metasheets: Frequency-selective transmission and perfect absorption,” Physical Review X, vol. 5, p. 031005, 2015.
21. H. Mei et al., “Metamaterial absorbers towards broadband, polarization insensitivity and tunability,” Optics & Laser Technology, vol. 147, p. 107627, 2022.
22. W. Li et al., “The RCS reduction of microstrip antenna design based on multi-band metamaterial absorber,” in Proc. 2015 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Workshop Series (IMWS-AMP), Suzhou, China, 2015, pp. 1–3.
23. M. Edries et al., “A Tri-band metamaterial absorber for radar cross section reduction,” International Journal of Microwave and Optical Technology, vol. 16, pp. 184–191, 2021.
24. O. Gunduz and C. Sabah, “Polarization angle independent perfect multiband metamaterial absorber and energy harvesting application,” Journal of Computational Electronics, vol. 15, pp. 228–238, 2016.
25. R. K. Singh and A. Gupta, “A wrenched-square shaped polarization independent and wide angle stable ultra-thin metamaterial absorber for S-band, X-band and Ku-band applications,” AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, vol. 132, p. 153648, 2021.
26. B. C. Zhou et al., “An ultrathin and broadband radar absorber using metamaterials,” Waves in Random and Complex Media, vol. 31, pp. 911–920, 2021.
27. C.-S. Ri et al., “Bandwidth analysis of microwave metamaterial absorber with a resistive frequency selective surface by using an equivalent circuit model,” AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, vol. 148, p. 154160, 2022.
28. M. L. Hakim et al., “Polarization insensitive symmetrical structured double negative (DNG) metamaterial absorber for Ku-band sensing applications,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, pp. 1–18, 2022.
29. C. Zhang et al., “Design and analysis of a polarization-independent and incident angle insensitive triple-band metamaterial absorber,” Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, vol. 138, p. 115131, 2022.
30. M. A. Shukoor, V. Kumar, and S. Dey, “Compact polarisation insensitive wide angular stable triple band absorber for RF energy harvesting, RCS reduction, and sensor applications,” International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 31, e22763, 2021.
31. M. Bakır et al., “Microwave metamaterial absorber for sensing applications,” Opto-Electronics Review, vol. 25, pp. 318–325, 2017.
32. F. Dincer et al., “Multi-band polarization independent cylindrical metamaterial absorber and sensor application,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 30, p. 1650095, 2016.
33. A. Hoque et al., “A polarization independent quasi-TEM metamaterial absorber for X and Ku band sensing applications,” Sensors, vol. 18, p. 4209, 2018.
34. H. Huang et al., “Design of broadband graphene-metamaterial absorbers for permittivity sensing at mid-infrared regions,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, pp. 1–10, 2018.
35. W. Zhang, J.-Y. Li, and J. Xie, “High sensitivity refractive index sensor based on metamaterial absorber,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research M, vol. 71, pp. 107–115, 2018.
36. Y. Zhang et al., “Microwave metamaterial absorber for non-destructive sensing applications of grain,” Sensors, vol. 18, p. 1912, 2018.
37. A. Salim and S. Lim, “Review of recent metamaterial microfluidic sensors,” Sensors, vol. 18, p. 232, 2018.
38. D. Prakash and N. Gupta, “Applications of metamaterial sensors: A review,” International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies, vol. 14, pp. 19–33, 2022.
39. S. Ayhan et al., “Radar-based high-accuracy angle measurement sensor operating in the K-band,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 15, pp. 937–945, 2014.
40. Z. Li et al., “Microwaves sensor for wind turbine blade inspection,” Applied Composite Materials, vol. 24, pp. 495–512, 2017.
41. R. Xu et al., “Actively logical modulation of MEMS-based terahertz metamaterial,” Photonics Research, vol. 9, pp. 1409–1415, 2021.
42. M. L. Hakim et al., “Wide-oblique-incident-angle stable polarization-insensitive ultra-wideband metamaterial perfect absorber for visible optical wavelength applications,” Materials, vol. 15, p. 2201, 2022.
Published
2024-11-12
How to Cite
Anshu Arya, & Dr. Sandeep Kumar Prasad. (2024). Dual Wide-Band Polarization Insensitive Metamaterial Absorber Based on Concentric Split-Ring and Circular Ring Resonators. Revista Electronica De Veterinaria, 25(2), 2157-2163. https://doi.org/10.69980/redvet.v25i2.2120
Section
Articles
