Addressing the Bottlenecks in IoT and 5G Integration: A Study on Existing Implementation Issues and Challenges

Priya; Dr. Mukesh Singla

doi:10.69980/redvet.v25i2.1908

Priya
Dr. Mukesh Singla

DOI: https://doi.org/10.69980/redvet.v25i2.1908

Keywords: IoT and 5G Integration, Network Challenges, Connectivity Issues

Abstract

The integration of Internet of Things (IoT) and Fifth-Generation (5G) networks is a transformative development that promises enhanced connectivity, reduced latency, and increased device density, fostering innovations across various industries. The seamless integration of IoT devices with 5G networks faces several significant challenges and bottlenecks, which hinder the realization of its full potential. This paper presents a comprehensive study on the existing implementation issues and challenges associated with the convergence of IoT and 5G. Key areas of concern include network architecture limitations, security vulnerabilities, interoperability between devices and protocols, spectrum management, and the scalability of infrastructure to handle massive IoT deployments. Furthermore, issues related to energy consumption, latency, and quality of service (QoS) requirements are explored in the context of real-time IoT applications. Detailed analysis of current research and case studies identifies the critical bottlenecks and proposes potential solutions for overcoming these hurdles. The findings provide valuable insights for researchers, network providers, and industry professionals working towards optimizing the integration of IoT and 5G technologies for future applications.

Author Biographies

Priya

Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science, Baba Mastnath University Rohtak

Dr. Mukesh Singla

Professor, Department of Computer Science, Baba Mastnath University Rohtak

References

1. M. Shrivastava and V. Ramgopal Rao, “A roadmap for disruptive applications and heterogeneous integration using two-dimensional materials: State-of-the-art and technological challenges,”*Nano Letters*, vol. 21, no. 15, pp. 6359–6381, 2021, doi: [10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00729](https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00729).
2. 2. S. Das, H.-Y. Chen, A. V. Penumatcha, and J. Appenzeller, “High performance multilayer MoS₂ transistors with scandium contacts,” *Nano Letters*, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 100–105, Jan 2013.[Online]Available: [https://doi.org/10.1021/nl303583v](https://doi.org/10.1021/nl303583v).
3. D. Kiriya, M. Tosun, P. Zhao, J. S. Kang, and A. Javey, “Air-stable surface charge transfer doping of MoS₂ by benzyl viologen,” *Journal of the American Chemical Society*, vol. 136, no.22,pp.7853–7856,June2014.[Online]Available: [https://doi.org/10.1021/ja5033327](https://doi.org/10.1021/ja5033327).
4. W. S. Leong, X. Luo, Y. Li, K. H. Khoo, S. Y. Quek, and J. T. L. Thong, “Low resistance metal contacts to MoS₂ devices with nickel-etched-graphene electrodes,” *ACS Nano*, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 869–877, Jan 2015, doi: [10.1021/nn506567r](https://doi.org/10.1021/nn506567r).
5. M. Brandbyge, J.-L. Mozos, P. Ordejón, J. Taylor, and K. Stokbro, “Density-functional method for non equilibrium electron transport,” *Physical Review B*, vol. 65, p. 165401, Mar 2002, doi: [10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165401](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165401).
6. P. Rastogi, S. Kumar, S. Bhowmick, A. Agarwal, and Y. S. Chauhan, “Doping strategies for monolayer MoS₂ via surface adsorption: A systematic study,” *The Journal of Physical Chemistry C*,vol.118,no.51,pp.30309–30314,2014, doi: [10.1021/jp510662n](https://doi.org/10.1021/jp510662n).
7. Y. Gui, W. Chen, Y. Lu, C. Tang, and L. Xu, “Au catalyst-modified MoS₂ monolayer as a highly effective adsorbent for SO₂F₂ gas: A DFT study,” *ACS Omega*, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 12204–12211,2019.[Online]Available: [https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01429](https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01429).
8. H.-Y. Chang, W. Zhu, and D. Akinwande, “On the mobility and contact resistance evaluation for transistors based on MoS₂ or two-dimensional semiconducting atomic crystals,” *Applied Physics Letters*, vol. 104, no. 11, p. 113504, 2014. [Online]. Available: [https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4868536](https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4868536).
9. S. Das, H.-Y. Chen, A. V. Penumatcha, and J. Appenzeller, “High performance multilayer MoS₂ transistors with scandium contacts,” *Nano Letters*, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 100–105, Jan 2013.[Online]Available: [https://doi.org/10.1021/nl303583v](https://doi.org/10.1021/nl303583v). *(Duplicate of #2)*
10. W. S. Leong, X. Luo, Y. Li, K. H. Khoo, S. Y. Quek, and J. T. L. Thong, “Low resistance metal contacts to MoS₂ devices with nickel-etched-graphene electrodes,” *ACS Nano*, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 869–877, Jan 2015, doi: [10.1021/nn506567r](https://doi.org/10.1021/nn506567r). *(Duplicate of #4)*
11. I. Shakir, Y. Huang, and X. Duan, “Pushing the performance limit of sub-100 nm molybdenum disulfide transistors,” *Nano Letters*, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 6337–6342, Oct 2016. [Online]Available: [https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02713](https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02713).
12. J. D. Lin, C. Han, F. Wang, R. Wang, D. Xiang, S. Qin, X.-A. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Zhang, A. T. S. Wee, and W. Chen, “Electron-doping-enhanced trion formation in monolayer molybdenum disulfide functionalized with cesium carbonate,” *ACS Nano*, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 5323–5329,May2014.[Online]Available: [https://doi.org/10.1021/nn501580c](https://doi.org/10.1021/nn501580c).