Compare The Effect Of Iastm And Stretching On Muscle Tightness For Shoulder Flexibilty In Gym Goers
Abstract
Introduction: The goal of addressing muscle tightness in gym-goers is to enhance performance, reduce discomfort, and prevent injury. Muscle tightness can result from several factors, including repetitive use, poor recovery, improper form, and muscle imbalances. When muscles are tight, they may limit range of motion, hinder strength output, and increase the risk of overuse injuries. Tight muscles can limit flexibility and range of motion, making it harder for individuals to perform exercises with proper form. This restriction can lead to compromised movement patterns, reduced efficiency during workouts, and possibly even poor posture. It can impact exercises like squats, deadlifts, and overhead presses, where full ROM is important for effectiveness and safety. Tight muscles are more prone to strains, tears, and injuries because they lack the elasticity to absorb stress. If the muscle is stiff, it’s less able to respond to sudden movements or force, leading to a higher likelihood of injury during training. A muscle pull or tear can sideline gym-goers for weeks, hindering their fitness progress.
Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of pectoralis muscle release using the IASTM tool on shoulder flexibility in the gym-going population.This study seeks to compare the impact of the IASTM tool on pectoralis muscle release for improving shoulder flexibility with the effects of stretching the pectoralis muscles. The results will help in preventing injuries and promoting better shoulder flexibility.
Methods: The methods used in this study aim to assess the effectiveness of self-stretching of the pectoralis muscle and IASTM tool release on shoulder flexibility in the gym-goer population. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, individuals who meet the requirements for the study will be selected as participants. The subjects will be divided into two groups: one group will receive IASTM tool release on the pectoralis muscle (30 subjects), and the second group will perform self-stretching of the pectoralis muscle (30 subjects). Pre- and post-treatment measurements will be taken using Apley’s Test, and the results will be recorded for analysis.
Results: After pre and post reading we compare the effectiveness of treatment for shoulder flexibility in gym goers to check which is more effective and find out the conclusion of the study that IASTM tool release of pectoralis muscle is more effective in gym goers on the aspect of shoulder flexibility as compare to self-stretching of pectoralis muscle.
Conclusion: The study concluded that both techniques had a beneficial effect, but the IASTM tool demonstrated greater effectiveness compared to static stretching in enhancing shoulder flexibility and alleviating tightness in the pectoralis muscles in gym-goers.
References
2. Pate RR. Physical activity and health: dose-response issues. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 1995 Dec 1;66(4):313-7.
3. Kauranen K, Nurkka N. Biomekaniikkaa: liikunnan ja terveydenhuollon ammattilaisille. Liikuntatieteellinen Seura; 2010.
4. Viljoen W. The weight training handbook. (No Title). 2003.
5. Aalto R, Seppänen L, Lindberg AP, Rinta M. Kaikki kuntosaliharjoittelusta. Docendo Oy. Jyväskylä. 2014.
6. McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Essentials of exercise physiology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
7. Nosaka K, Newton M, Sacco P. Muscle damage and soreness after endurance exercise of the elbow flexors. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2002 Jun 1;34(6):920-7.
8. Rosa DP, Borstad JD, Pogetti LS, Camargo PR. Effects of a stretching protocol for the pectoralis minor on muscle length, function, and scapular kinematics in individuals with and without shoulder pain. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):20-9.
9. Howitt S, Jung S, Hammonds N. Conservative treatment of a tibialis posterior strain in a novice triathlete: a case report. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2009 Mar;53(1):23.
10. Strunk RG, Pfefer MT, Dube D. Multimodal chiropractic care of pain and disability for a patient diagnosed with benign joint hypermobility syndrome: a case report. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2014 Mar 1;13(1):35-42.
11. Morton SK, Whitehead JR, Brinkert RH, Caine DJ. Resistance training vs. static stretching: effects on flexibility and strength. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2011 Dec 1;25(12):3391-8.
12. McGinnis PM. Biomechanics of sport and exercise. Human Kinetics; 2013.
13. Paaso N. Gym Training Guide: An Introduction to the Fundamentals of Weight Training.
14. Pathania AR. Immediate effects of M2T blade on hamstring flexibility in elderly population: A pilot study. IJAR. 2018;4(1):265-7.
15. Heinecke ML, Thuesen ST, Stow RC. Graston technique on shoulder motion in overhead athletes. J Undergrad Kinesiol Res. 2014;10(1):27-39.
16. Treloar J. Therapeutic Effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and the Use in Athletic Populations: A Literature Review.
17. Zakas A. The effect of stretching duration on the lower-extremity flexibility of adolescent soccer players. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2005 Jul 1;9(3):220-5.
18. Laudner K, Compton BD, McLoda TA, Walters CM. Acute effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization for improving posterior shoulder range of motion in collegiate baseball players. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2014 Feb;9(1):1.
