Study and Analysis of Grid-Based Cloud Computing using different Computer Applications
Abstract
The research focuses on the perception of cloud web portal service data storage quality between companies for internet-based cloud data storage grids scheduling services. The study found significant variance between the two sample populations (Infosys and TCS) in attributes such as Tangibility, Reliability, and Responsiveness, Credibility, and Data security. The client response to reliability was more varied, with Infosys ranking higher than TCS. In responsiveness, TCS ranked higher than Infosys, suggesting smaller enterprises are more responsive. In credibility and Data security, both companies had a mean score above 10, indicating high levels of Cloud Storage credibility. ANOVA testing confirmed the findings, with no significant difference in the perception of credibility and security aspects between the two main Cloud Services Providing companies. However, there was no clear influence of one attribute over another in forming a client's perception of a company's Cloud web portal qualities observation. This thesis examines Data Grid Scheduling systems in Cloud web portals, focusing on their unique features such as heavy computing requirements, geographically distributed resources, and collaboration among users. It also examines the architecture of Data Grids used in cloud portals, data transport mechanisms, data replication systems, and resource allocation. The study demonstrates that considering data presence and computational resource availability improves application scheduling performance by improving job turnaround time. The Grid bus broker is effective for executing scientific applications on Grid resources, but there is still a question of whether newer application models can accommodate the current architecture. The Grid community has recently standardized on the Web Cloud Services Resource Framework (WSRF), which requires the broker to compose services based on their attributes and create service aggregations to achieve users' utility functions. The research findings indicate that client's Cloud web portal qualities perceive a difference in service offered by internet sites, with significant differences in tangibility, reliability, and responsiveness. Factors such as security and credibility are more relevant for Cloud web portal Data Grids or online cloud storage service companies. Future work aims to address new questions and improve understanding of Data Grid Scheduling in Cloud web portals.References
Youseff, L., Butrico, M. and Da Silva, D. (2008). Toward a Unified Ontology of Cloud Computing.In Grid Computing Environments Workshop (GCE '08),Austin, Texas, USA, November 2008, 1-10.
Qamar, S., Lal, N., Singh, M., (2010). Internet Ware Cloud Computing: hallenges.(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, Vol. 7, No. 3, March 2010.
Wozniak, T., and Ristol, S., Grid and Cloud Computing A Business Perspective on Technology and Applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
J. Sithiyopasakul, T. Archevapanich, S. Sithiyopasakul, A. Lasakul, B. Purahong and C. Benjangkaprasert, "Implementation of Cloud Computing and Internet of Things (IoT) by Performance Evaluation," 2024 12th International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON), Pattaya, Thailand, 2024, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/iEECON60677.2024.10537945.
Kourpas E (2006) Grid Computing: Past, Present and Future – An Innovation Perspective.IBM white paper.
Joseph J, Ernest M, Fellenstein C (2004) Evolution of Grid Computing Architecture and Grid Adoption Models.IBM Syst. J. 43(4):624-644
S. Kushwaha and A. Rai, "Mobile Cloud Computing: The Future of Cloud," 2024 OPJU International Technology Conference (OTCON) on Smart Computing for Innovation and Advancement in Industry 4.0, Raigarh, India, 2024, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/OTCON60325.2024.10687896.
Foster I, Zhao Y, Raicu I, Lu S (2008) Cloud Computing and Grid Computing 360-Degree Compared. In: Grid Computing Environments Workshop (GCE’08).doi:10.1109/GCE.2008.4738445
Cloud Security Alliance. (2009). Security Guidance for Critical Areas of Focus in Cloud Computing.
M. Ansari, S. Arshad Ali and M. Alam, "Internet of things (IoT) fusion with cloud computing: current research and future direction", International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration, pp. 1812-1845, 2022.
Ozsu, M. T. and Valduriez, P. (1999). Principles of distributed database systems. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2nd edition.
Moore, R., Rajasekar, A., and Wan, M. (2005). Data Grids, Digital Libraries and Persistent Archives: An Integrated Approach to Publishing, Sharing and Archiving Datas. Proceedings of the IEEE (Special Issue on Grid Computing), 93(3)
N. Kashyap, A. Rana, V. Kansal and Himdweep Walia, "Improve Cloud Based IoT Architecture Layer Security - A Literature Review", 2021 International Conference on Computing Communication and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS) Greater Noida India, pp. 112-115, 2021.
Mahajan, R., Bellovin, S. M., Floyd, S., Ioannidis, J., Paxson, V., and Shenker, S.(2002). Controlling High Bandwidth Aggregates in the Network. Computer Communications Review, 32(3):62–73.
Krauter, K., Buyya, R., and Maheswaran, M. (2002). A taxonomy and survey of grid resource management systems for distributed computing. Software: Practice and Experience (SPE), 32(2):135–164
M. Humayun, "Role of Emerging IoT Big Data and Cloud Computing for Real Time Application", International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 494-506, 2020.
Brady, M., Gavaghan, D., Simpson, A., Parada, M. M., and Highnam, R. (2003).Grid Computing: Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality, chapter eDiamond: AGrid-Enabled Federated Database of Annotated Mammograms, pages 923–943. WileyPress, London, UK.
Z. Ma, Y. Liu, X. Liu, J. Ma and F. Li, "Privacy-Preserving Outsourced Speech Recognition for Smart IoT Devices", IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, 2019.
P. S. Almeida, C. Baquero, N. Preguiça and D. Hutchison, Scalable Bloom Filters, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 255261, 2007.
G. Cormode and S. Muthukrishnan, "An Improved Data Stream Summary: The Count-Min Sketch and its Applications", Journal of Algorithms, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 58-75, 2005.
Fox, R. Griffith, A. D. Joseph, R. H. Katz, A. Konwinski, G. Lee, et al., Above the Clouds, 2009.
G. Malewicz, M. H. Austern, A. J. Bik, J. C. Dehnert, I. Horn, N. Leiser, et al., "Pregel: A System for Large-scale Graph Processing", Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 135-146, 2010.
Z. Zhang and Y. Zhang, "A Survey of Distributed File Systems", Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 18341852, 2014.
D. Ongaro and J. Ousterhout, Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm. 2014 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC 14), pp. 305-319, 2014.
T. Chen, M. Li, Y. Li, M. Lin, N. Wang, M. Wang, et al., MXNet: A Flexible and Efficient Machine Learning Library for Heterogeneous Distributed Systems, 2015.
J. Dean and L. A. Barroso, "The Tail at Scale", Communications of the ACM, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 74-80, 2013.
J. Dean and S. Ghemawat, MapReduce: A Flexible Data Processing Tool, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 72-77, 2010.
