Revolutionizing Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery - Reviewing The Concept Of 3d Printing And Virtual Surgical Planning
Abstract
Orthognathic surgery, specifically, is a subset of oral and maxillofacial surgery that focuses on correcting diseases and disorders affecting the structure of the jaw and face, sleep patterns, TMJ disorders, malocclusion problems owing to skeletal disharmonies, and other orthodontic problems that cannot be easily treated with orthodontics [1]. These surgeries aim to improve chewing, speaking, and breathing functionality while enhancing the patient’s appearance [2]. On the other hand, oral maxillofacial surgery is a broader field that not only includes orthognathic surgery but also concerns the treatment of diseases and injuries of both the functional and aesthetic aspects of the hard and soft tissues of the oral and maxillofacial region [3]. This can range from the removal of impacted teeth and administering of complex facial reconstructions to the treatment of oral cancer, cleft lip and palate, and chronic facial pain disorders. These fields require an in-depth understanding of the interplay between aesthetics and function, and the complex anatomical structures and their relationships in the craniomaxillofacial region [4]. Surgeons specializing in these areas combine their expertise in dentistry, surgery, and general medicine to provide comprehensive care for patients.
References
2. Lee, Y.C.; Sohn, H.B.; Park, Y.W.; Oh, J.H. Evaluation of postoperative changes in condylar positions after orthognathic surgery using balanced orthognathic surgery system. Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2022, 44, 11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Hartmann, A.; Schmohl, J.; Cascant Ortolano, L.; Bayer, O.; Schweizer, S.; Welte-Jzyk, C.; Al-Nawas, B.; Daubländer, M. Therapy of neurophysiological changes after oral and maxillofacial surgery—A systematic review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1507. [CrossRef]
4. Bartella, A.K.; Kamal, M.; Scholl, I.; Schiffer, S.; Steegmann, J.; Ketelsen, D.; Hölzle, F.; Lethaus, B. Virtual reality in preoperative imaging in maxillofacial surgery: Implementation of “the next level”? Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2019, 57, 644–648. [CrossRef]
5. Sugahara, K.; Koyachi, M.; Odaka, K.; Matsunaga, S.; Katakura, A. A safe, stable, and convenient three-dimensional device for high Le Fort I osteotomy. Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2020, 42, 32. [CrossRef]
6. Park, S.Y.; Hwang, D.S.; Song, J.M.; Kim, U.K. Comparison of time and cost between conventional surgical planning and virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery in Korea. Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2021, 43, 18. [CrossRef]
7. O’Connor, M.K.; Emanuelli, E.; Garg, R.K. Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy in a Jehovah’s Witness patient: Strategies for minimizing blood loss and maximizing safety. Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2022, 44, 10. [CrossRef]
8.Aydil, B.A.; Akba¸s, M.; Ayhan, M.; Atalı, O.; Can, S.; Çömlekçio ˘glu, Y. Retrospective examination of complications observed in orthognathic surgical surgery in 85 patients. Turk. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2022, 28, 698.
9. Alkhayer, A.; Piffkó, J.; Lippold, C.; Segatto, E. Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: A systematic review. Head Face Med. 2020, 16, 1–9. [CrossRef]
10. Schneider, D.; Kämmerer, P.W.; Hennig, M.; Schön, G.; Thiem, D.G.; Bschorer, R. Customized virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: A prospective randomized trial. Clin. Oral Investig. 2019, 23, 3115–3122. [CrossRef]
11. Büyükçoban, S.; Öner, Ö.; Hanci, V. A bibliometric analysis of the most cited articles in geriatric anesthesia. Turk. J. Geriatr. 2020, 23, 410–418. [CrossRef]
12. Pimkhaokham, A.; Jiaranuchart, S.; Kaboosaya, B.; Arunjaroensuk, S.; Subbalekha, K.; Mattheos, N. Can computer-assisted implant surgery improve clinicaloutcomes and reduce the frequency and intensity of complications in implant dentistry? A critical review. Periodontol. 2000 2022, 90, 197–223. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Wang, Y.; Cao, D.; Chen, S.L.; Li, Y.M.; Zheng, Y.W.; Ohkohchi, N. Current trends in three-dimensional visualization and real-time navigation as well as robot-assisted technologies in hepatobiliary surgery. World J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2021, 13, 904. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Youn, S.; Geismar, H.N.; Pinedo, M. Planning and scheduling in healthcare for better care coordination: Current understanding, trending topics, and future opportunities. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2022, 31, 4407–4423. [CrossRef]
15. Sadeghi, A.H.; El Mathari, S.; Abjigitova, D.; Maat, A.P.; Taverne, Y.J.; Bogers, A.J.; Mahtab, E.A. Current and future applications of virtual, augmented, and mixed reality in cardiothoracic surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2022, 113, 681–691. [CrossRef]
16. Gonzalez, G.; Roppolo, I.; Pirri, C.F.; Chiappone, A. Current and emerging trends in polymeric 3D printed microfluidic devices. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 55, 102867. [CrossRef]
17. Praveena, B.A.; Lokesh, N.; Buradi, A.; Santhosh, N.; Praveena, B.L.; Vignesh, R. A comprehensive review of emerging additive manufacturing (3D printing technology): Methods, materials, applications, challenges, trends and future potential. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 52, 1309–1313.Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9907 13 of 15
18. Ge, Q.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z.; Kowsari, K.; Zhang, W.; He, X.; Zhou, J.; Fang, N.X. Projection micro stereolithography based 3D printing and its applications. Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 2020, 2, 022004. [CrossRef]
19. Wasti, S.; Adhikari, S. Use of biomaterials for 3D printing by fused deposition modeling technique: A review. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 315. [CrossRef]
20. Awad, A.; Fina, F.; Goyanes, A.; Gaisford, S.; Basit, A.W. 3D printing: Principles and pharmaceutical applications of selective laser sintering. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 586, 119594. [CrossRef]
21. Dod, G.; Jibhakate, R.; Walke, P. A review on 3D printing maxillofacial surgery: Present work and future prospects. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, in press. [CrossRef]
22. Prakash, K.S.; Nancharaih, T.; Rao, V.V.S. Additive manufacturing techniques in manufacturing—An overview. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 3873–3882. [CrossRef]
23. Metlerski, M.; Grocholewicz, K.; Jaro ´n, A.; Lipski, M.; Trybek, G. Comparison of presurgical dental models manufactured with two different three-dimensional printing techniques. J. Healthc. Eng. 2020, 2020, 8893338. [CrossRef]
24. Felice, P.; Barausse, C.; Pistilli, R.; Spinato, S.; Bernardello, F. Guided “sandwich” technique: A novel surgical approach for safe osteotomies in the treatment of vertical bone defects in the posterior atrophic mandible: A case report. Implant Dent. 2014, 23,
738–744. [CrossRef]
25. Yang, Y.; Wang, G.; Liang, H.; Gao, C.; Peng, S.; Shen, L.; Shuai, C. Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds. Int. J. Bioprint. 2018, 5, 148. [CrossRef]
26. Ngo, T.D.; Kashani, A.; Imbalzano, G.; Nguyen, K.T.Q.; Hui, D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 143, 172–196. [CrossRef]
27. Dos Santos, J.; de Oliveira, R.S.; de Oliveira, T.V.; Velho, M.C.; Konrad, M.V.; da Silva, G.S.; Deon, M.; Beck, R.C. 3D printing and nanotechnology: A multiscale alliance in personalized medicine. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2009691. [CrossRef]
28. Paxton, N.C.; Nightingale, R.C.; Woodruff, M.A. Capturing patient anatomy for designing and manufacturing personalized prostheses. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022, 73, 282–289. [CrossRef]
29. Aimar, A.; Palermo, A.; Innocenti, B. The role of 3D printing in medical applications: A state of the art. J. Healthc. Eng. 2019, 2019, 5340616. [CrossRef]
30. Jaksa, L.; Pahr, D.; Kronreif, G.; Lorenz, A. Development of a multi-material 3D printer for functional anatomic models. Int. J. Bioprint. 2021, 7, 420. [CrossRef]
31. Jo, Y.Y.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, M.K.; Shin, S.H.; Ahn, J.; Seok, H. Mandibular reconstruction using a customized three-dimensional titanium implant applied on the lingual surface of the mandible. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2018, 29, 415–419. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Carneiro, N.C.; Oliveira, D.V.; Real, F.H.; da Silva Tabosa, A.K.; Júnior, J.T. A new model of customized maxillary guide for orthognathic surgery: Precision analysis. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2020, 48, 1119–1125. [CrossRef]
33. Seok, J.; Yoon, S.; Ryu, C.H.; Kim, S.K.; Ryu, J.; Jung, Y.S. A personalized 3D-printed model for obtaining informed consent process for thyroid surgery: A randomized clinical study using a deep learning approach with mesh-type 3D modeling. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 574. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. May, M.M.; Howe, B.M.; O'Byrne, T.J.; Alexander, A.E.; Morris, J.M.; Moore, E.J.; Kasperbauer, J.L.; Janus, J.R.; Van Abel, K.M.; Dickens, H.J.; et al. Short and long-term outcomes of three-dimensional printed surgical guides and virtual surgical planning versus conventional methods for fibula free flap reconstruction of the mandible: Decreased nonunion and complication rates. Head Neck 2021, 43, 2342–2352. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Singh, A.K.; Khanal, N.; Chaulagain, R.; Sharma, N.; Thieringer, F.M. Is the pre-shaping of an orbital implant on a patient-specific 3D-printed model advantageous compared to conventional free-hand shaping? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3426. [CrossRef]
36. Hertanto, M.; Ayoub, A.F.; Benington, P.C.; Naudi, K.B.; McKenzie, P.S. Orthognathic patient perception of 3D facial soft tissue prediction planning. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2021, 49, 783–788. [CrossRef]
37. Steinbacher, D.M. Three-dimensional analysis and surgical planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015, 73, S40–S56. [CrossRef]
38. Park, J.H.; Jo, E.; Cho, H.; Kim, H.J. Temporomandibular joint reconstruction with alloplastic prosthesis: The outcomes of four cases. Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2017, 39, 6. [CrossRef]
39. Zimmerer, R.M.; Ellis, E., 3rd; Aniceto, G.S.; Schramm, A.; Wagner, M.E.; Grant, M.P.; Cornelius, C.P.; Strong, E.B.; Rana, M.; Chye, L.T.; et al. A prospective multicenter study to compare the precision of posttraumatic internal orbital reconstruction with standard preformed and individualized orbital implants. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2016, 44, 1485–1497.
40. Shan, X.F.; Chen, H.M.; Liang, J.; Huang, J.W.; Cai, Z.G. Surgical reconstruction of maxillary and mandibular defects using a printed titanium mesh. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015, 73, 1437.e1–1437.e9. [CrossRef]
41. Bertollo, N.; Da Assuncao, R.; Hancock, N.J.; Lau, A.; Walsh, W.R. Influence of electron beam melting manufactured implants on ingrowth and shear strength in an ovine model. J. Arthroplast. 2012, 27, 1429–1436. [CrossRef]
42. Al Deek, N.F.; Wei, F.C.; Tsao, C.K. Fistulae after successful free tissue transfer to head and neck: Its prevention and treatment. Clin. Plast. Surg. 2016, 43, 739–745. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Kim, J.W.; Hwang, J.H.; Ahn, K.M. Fibular flap for mandible reconstruction in osteoradionecrosis of the jaw: Selection criteria of fibula flap. Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2016, 38, 46. [CrossRef]Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9907 14 of 15
44. Probst, F.A.; Metzger, M.; Ehrenfeld, M.; Cornelius, C.P. Computer-assisted designed and manufactured procedures facilitate the lingual application of mandible reconstruction plates. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2016, 74, 1879–1895. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Joshi, G.V.; Duan, Y.; Neidigh, J.; Koike, M.; Chahine, G.; Kovacevic, R.; Okabe, T.; Griggs, J.A. Fatigue testing of electron beam-melted Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy for dental implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2013, 101, 124–130. [CrossRef]
46. Tilton, M.; Lewis, G.S.; Hast, M.W.; Fox, E.; Manogharan, G. Additively manufactured patient-specific prosthesis for tumor reconstruction: Design, process, and properties. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0253786. [CrossRef]
47. Barbur, I.; Opris, H.; Crisan, B.; Cuc, S.; Colosi, H.A.; Baciut, M.; Opris, D.; Prodan, D.; Moldovan, M.; Crisan, L.; et al. Statistical comparison of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed resin through triple-jetting technology and conventional PMMA in orthodontic occlusal splint manufacturing. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2155. [CrossRef]
48. Moiduddin, K.; Mian, S.H.; Elseufy, S.M.; Alkhalefah, H.; Ramalingam, S.; Sayeed, A. Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and its 3D-printed quantitate assessment in cranial reconstruction. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 429. [CrossRef]
49. Yamada, H.; Nakaoka, K.; Sonoyama, T.; Kumagai, K.; Ikawa, T.; Shigeta, Y.; Harada, N.; Kawamura, N.; Ogawa, T.; Hamada, Y. Clinical usefulness of mandibular reconstruction using custom-made titanium mesh tray and autogenous particulate cancellous bone and marrow harvested from tibia and/or ilia. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2016, 27, 586–592. [CrossRef]
50. Zhou, L.B.; Shang, H.T.; He, L.S.; Bo, B.; Liu, G.C.; Liu, Y.P.; Zhao, J.L. Accurate reconstruction of discontinuous mandible using a reverse engineering/computer-aided design/rapid prototyping technique: A preliminary clinical study. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2010, 68, 2115–2121. [CrossRef]
51. Lee, U.L.; Kwon, J.S.; Woo, S.H.; Choi, Y.J. Simultaneous bimaxillary surgery and mandibular reconstruction with a 3-dimensional printed titanium implant fabricated by electron beam melting: A preliminary mechanical testing of the printed mandible. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2016, 74, 1501.e1–1501.e15. [CrossRef]
52. Klasen, J.R.; Thatcher, G.P.; Bleedorn, J.A.; Soukup, J.W. Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing: Methodology and applications in veterinary oromaxillofacial surgery. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 971318. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
53. Trevisiol, L.; Bersani, M.; Martinez Garza, A.; Alvarado, E.; Arnett, G.W.; D’Agostino, A. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with mandible first sequence: A retrospective study. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2023, 51, 280–287. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54. Oh, H.J.; Son, I.S.; Lee, S.J.; Sohn, H.B.; Seo, B.M. Effect of maxillary impaction on mandibular surgical accuracy in virtuallyplanned orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2023, 51, 387–392. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55. Tabchi, Y.; Zaoui, F.; Bahoum, A. Accuracy of hard and soft tissue prediction using three-dimensional simulation software in bimaxillary osteotomies: A systematic review. Int. Orthod. 2023, 21, 100802. [CrossRef]
56. Unberath, M.; Gao, C.; Hu, Y.; Judish, M.; Taylor, R.H.; Armand, M.; Grupp, R. The impact of machine learning on 2d/3d registration for image-guided interventions: A systematic review and perspective. Front. Robot. AI 2021, 8, 716007. [CrossRef]
57. Vyas, K.; Gibreel, W.; Mardini, S. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. Facial Plast. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2022, 30, 239–253. [CrossRef]
58. Chen, Z.; Mo, S.; Fan, X.; You, Y.; Ye, G.; Zhou, N. A meta-analysis and systematic review comparing the effectiveness of traditional and virtual surgical planning for orthognathic surgery: Based on randomized clinical trials. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2021, 79, 471-e1. [CrossRef]
59. Valls-Ontañón, A.; Ascencio-Padilla, R.D.; Vela-Lasagabaster, A.; Sada-Malumbres, A.; Haas-Junior, O.L.; Masià-Gridilla, J.; Hernández-Alfaro, F. Relevance of 3D virtual planning in predicting bony interferences between distal and proximal fragments after sagittal split osteotomy. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020, 49, 1020–1028. [CrossRef]
60. Zhang, C.; Teng, L.; Chan, F.C.; Xu, J.J.; Lu, J.J.; Xie, F.; Zhao, J.Y.; Xu, M.B.; Jin, X.L. Single stage surgery for contouring the prominent mandibular angle with a broad chin deformity: En-bloc Mandibular Angle-Body-Chin Curved Ostectomy (MABCCO) and Outer Cortex Grinding (OCG). J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2014, 42, 1225–1233. [CrossRef]
61. Ye, N.; Long, H.; Zhu, S.; Yang, Y.; Lai, W.; Hu, J. The accuracy of computer image-guided template for mandibular angle ostectomy. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2015, 39, 117–123. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
62. Tominaga, K.; Habu, M.; Tsurushima, H.; Takahashi, O.; Yoshioka, I. CAD/CAM splint based on soft tissue 3D simulation for treatment of facial asymmetry. Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2016, 38, 4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
63. Lim, S.H.; Kim, M.K.; Kang, S.H. Genioplasty using a simple CAD/CAM (computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing) surgical guide. Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2015, 37, 44. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
64. Liu, D.; Huang, J.; Shan, L.; Wang, J. Intraoral curved ostectomy for prominent mandibular angle by grinding, contiguous drilling, and chiseling. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2011, 22, 2109–2113. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
65. Souza, G.A.; Ribeiro, R.D.; Azevedo, F.; Freitas, P.H. Reduction mandibuloplasty for facial aesthetic enhancement in western women—A case report. Biosci. J. 2016, 32, 781–786. [CrossRef]
66. Seok, H.; Kim, S.G.; Park, Y.W.; Lee, Y.C. Postoperative three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular contouring surgery using computer-assisted simulation planning and a three-dimensional-printed surgical guide. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2017, 28, 768–770. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
67. Pandian, S.M.; Gandedkar, N.H.; Kumar Palani, S.; Kim, Y.J.; Adel, S.M. An integrated 3D-driven protocol for surgery first
orthognathic approach (SFOA) using virtual surgical planning (VSP). Semin. Orthod. 2022, 28, 320–333. [CrossRef]
68. Hurley, C.M.; Walsh, R.M.; Shine, N.P.; O’Neill, J.P.; Martin, F.; O’Sullivan, J.B. Current trends in craniofacial reconstruction. Surgeon 2023, 21, e118–e125. [CrossRef]Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9907 15 of 15
69. Wu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Lu, L.; Chen, Y.; Long, H.; Wang, J. Virtual simulation in undergraduate medical education: A scoping review of recent practice. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 855403. [CrossRef]
70. Malik, H.H.; Darwood, A.R.; Shaunak, S.; Kulatilake, P.; Abdulrahman, A.; Mulki, O.; Baskaradas, A. Three-dimensional printing in surgery: A review of current surgical applications. J. Surg. Res. 2015, 199, 512–522. [CrossRef]
71. Cho, K.H.; Papay, F.A.; Yanof, J.; West, K.; Bassiri Gharb, B.; Rampazzo, A.; Gastman, B.; Schwarz, G.S. Mixed reality and 3D printed models for planning and execution of face transplantation. Ann. Surg. 2021, 274, e1238–e1246. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
72. Sears, V.A.; Morris, J.M. Establishing a point-of-care virtual planning and 3D printing program. In Seminars in Plastic Surgery; Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2022; Volume 36, pp. 133–148.
73. Fu, X.; Qiao, J.; Girod, S.; Niu, F.; Liu, J.F.; Lee, G.K.; Gui, L. Standardized protocol for virtual surgical plan and 3-dimensional surgical template—Assisted single-stage mandible contour surgery. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2017, 79, 236–242. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
74. Ostas, D.; Almăs, an, O.; Iles, an, R.R.; Andrei, V.; Thieringer, F.M.; Hedes,iu, M.; Rotar, H. Point-of-care virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in oral and cranio-maxillofacial surgery: A narrative review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6625. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
75. Patel, P.; Dhal, K.; Gupta, R.; Tappa, K.; Rybicki, F.J.; Ravi, P. Medical 3D printing using desktop inverted vat photopolymerization: Background, clinical applications, and challenges. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 782. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
76. Zoabi, A.; Redenski, I.; Oren, D.; Kasem, A.; Zigron, A.; Daoud, S.; Moskovich, L.; Kablan, F.; Srouji, S. 3D printing and virtual surgical planning in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2385. [CrossRef]
77. Beek, D.M.; Baan, F.; Liebregts, J.; Bergé, S.; Maal, T.; Xi, T. Surgical accuracy in 3D planned bimaxillary osteotomies: Intraoral scans and plaster casts as digital dentition models. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022, 51, 922–928. [CrossRef]
78. Francisco, I.; Ribeiro, M.P.; Marques, F.; Travassos, R.; Nunes, C.; Pereira, F.; Caramelo, F.; Paula, A.B.; Vale, F. Application of three-dimensional digital technology in orthodontics: The state of the art. Biomimetics 2022, 7, 23. [CrossRef]
79. Kuruoglu, D.; Yan, M.; Bustos, S.S.; Morris, J.M.; Alexander, A.E.; Sharaf, B. Point of care virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in facial gender confirmation surgery: A narrative review. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021, 9, 614. [CrossRef]
80. Assari, A. Usability of three-dimensional printing in maxillofacial surgery: A narrative review. Open Dent. J. 2023, 17, e187421062304190. [CrossRef]
81. Pamias-Romero, J.; Masnou-Pratdesaba, J.; Sáez-Barba, M.; de-Pablo-García-Cuenca, A.; Siurana-Montilva, S.; Sala-Cunill, A.; Valls-Comamala, V.; Pujol-Pina, R.; Bescós-Atín, C. Personalized surgery service in a tertiary hospital: A method to increase effectiveness, precision, safety and quality in maxillofacial surgery using custom-made 3D prostheses and implants. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4791. [CrossRef]
82. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on Medical Devices, Amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and Repealing Council Directive 90/985/EEC and 93/42/EEC. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R0745 (accessed on 28 August 2023).