Digital Proofs And Legal Admissibility: Understanding Electronic Evidence Under The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam

  • Dr. Anju Sinha
Keywords: Electronic evidence, digital, data, document, technology

Abstract

The ‘Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023’ has repealed the ‘Indian Evidence Act, 1872’  and introduced significant provisions for the ‘admissibility’, ‘relevance,’ and ‘reliability’ of ‘electronic evidence’ in legal proceedings. This paper explores the legal framework under the ‘Indian Evidence Act’ and Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam governing ‘electronic evidence’, focusing on its admissibility under Sections 61 to 65B. New methods are required to ensure the authenticity and integrity of evidence due to the transition from traditional physical evidence to electronic formats like emails, digital documents, and social media information.  The Act tackles issues like the chain of custody, certification's function in digital evidence, and striking a balance between individuals' right to privacy and the process of legal discovery. Special emphasis is placed on the procedural requirements for presenting electronic records, with detailed analysis of court rulings on their applicability. Additionally, this paper reviews the challenges courts face in interpreting electronic evidence and suggests best practices for legal professionals in handling digital evidence under the new legislative regime.

Author Biography

Dr. Anju Sinha

Assistant Professor (Selection Grade) Faculty of Law, University of Delhi.

References

1. Abdul Rahaman Kunji v. State of West Bengal, (2014) 2 CHN 754 (Cal).
2. Amitabh Bagchi v. Ena Bagchi, AIR 2005 Cal 11 (AIR 2005 Cal 11).
3. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer & Ors., (2014) 10 SCC 473.
4. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer & Others, (2014) 10 SCC 473.
5. Banker’s Book Evidence Act, No. 18, Acts of Parliament, 1891 (India).
6. Banker’s Book Evidence Act, No. 18, Acts of Parliament, 1891 (India).
7. Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, No. 12, Acts of Parliament, 2023 (India).
8. Black’s Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014).
9. Dharambir v. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2007) 139 DLT 289 (Del).
10. Indian Evidence Act, No. 1, Acts of Parliament, 1872 (India).
11. Indian Penal Code, No. 45, Acts of Parliament, 1860 (India).
12. Information Technology Act, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).
13. Information Technology Act, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).
14. Jagjit Singh v. State of Haryana, (2006) 11 SCC 1.
15. Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, No. 46, Acts of the Punjab State Legislature, 1948 (India).
16. Karia T. D. (2008) ‘Digital Evidence: An Indian Perspective’, Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, Vol 5, available at https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/20116845.pdf (accessed on July 20, 2024).
17. Sajidbeg Asifbeg Mirza v. State of Gujarat, (2011) 2 GLR 1741 (Guj).
18. Sharad Yadav & Ors. v. Union of India, (2003) 4 SCC 2.
19. State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu alias Afzal Guru, (2005) 11 SCC 600.
20. State of Bihar v. Sri Radha Krishna (1983) 2 SCR 808.
21. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai, (2003) 4 SCC 601.
22. State of Punjab & Ors. v. M/S. Amritsar Beverages Ltd., AIR 2006 SC 2820.
23. Tomaso Bruno & Anr. v. State of U.P., (2015) 7 SCC 178.
24. United Nations Comm’n on Int’l Trade Law, Model Law on Electronic Commerce (1996).
Published
2024-10-14
How to Cite
Dr. Anju Sinha. (2024). Digital Proofs And Legal Admissibility: Understanding Electronic Evidence Under The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam. Revista Electronica De Veterinaria, 25(2), 28- 33. https://doi.org/10.69980/redvet.v25i2.1205